In the Develop module, it will engage the GPU, but probably doesn't max it out. It can and will push all the CPU cores - especially the high power performance cores - as far as they will go, especially during preview building and export. Like many Adobe applications, Lightroom Classic is at the other end of system usage. Because of the video coprocessors in the M1 Pro/Max, it’s possible that not only might those tests be light on the CPU, they might be mostly handled on the low power efficiency cores of the CPU, and that is how you get to 17–21 hours. MacBook Pro 14 vs.So 17–21 hours applies to web browsing and video playback. I’m still waiting for Apple to fix the Mac Mini’s major problemĪpple’s M2 Max chip may bring next-level performance to the MacBook Pro Is Apple’s Mac Mini M2 any good? Here’s what reviews say Your next MacBook Pro could be even faster than expected New retouching features are coming to Photoshop Express, a rotate view is coming to Illustrator on desktop, and new styling tools are coming to Adobe XD.

Lightroom and Lightroom Classic are getting new premium presets and collaborative editing capabilities. In addition to the optimization for M1 Macs, Adobe is also shipping some new features for the Creative Cloud suite. The only difference, per the research, came down to features that needed GPU acceleration, where an Intel Mac with a discrete GPU “can still outperform the current generation of M1 Macs in some areas.” All these apps no longer run under Apple’s Rosetta 2 emulation, which is designed for apps running on Intel-based Macs. Adobe had claimed that opening and saving files, running filters, and compute-heavy operations in Photoshop could be up to 1.5 times faster on Apple M1 Macs compared to the non-optimized version. As for Lightroom Classic, the tasks included importing RAW images, full-screen image selection, and merging and enhancing images.Īdobe Photoshop was also optimized for M1 silicon in March, after a period of testing. Tasks included dealing with sector-based illustrations and complex artboards on Illustrator and brochures with high-resolution images in InDesign. In the average of all tested benchmarks, Adobe Illustrator saw a 65% performance increase over the Intel Mac, InDesign a 59% increase, and Lightroom Classic a 116% increase. More specifically, Adobe and Pfeiffer Consulting find that with these new native apps, you can see some big gains. I replaced my MacBook with a Quest Pro for a full work week.

Got an M1 Mac? Apple will now let you repair it yourself

Macbook m1 lightroom